Name
Address
City
Zip
Preferred E-mail
Alternate E-mail
Cell Phone
Work Phone
Home Phone
Graduation from HS
High School Attended
University Attended
Current School Affliation
Thursday, April 11
3:30pm  Rd 1 USX, FX, HI, OO
5:30pm  Rd 2 USX, FX, HI, OO
6:30pm  Rd 1 CX, LD, PF, DI
8:30pm  Rd 2 CX, LD, PF, DI
Friday, April 12
3:30pm  Rd 3 LD, PF, DI
5:30pm  Rd 3 USX, FX, OO, HI
6:30pm  Rd 3 CX; Rd 4 LD, PF, DI
8:30pm  Rd 4  USX, FX, OO, HI, DI
Saturday, April 13
8:00am  Rd 1 DUO; Rd 5 LD, PF, HI, DI
10:15am  Rd 5 USX, FX, OO; Rd 6 HI
11:30am  Rd 2 DUO, Rd 4 CX; Rd 6 LD, PF
1:45pm  Rd 3 DUO; Rd 6 USX, FX, OO, DI
3:00pm  Rd 5 CX; Rd 7 LD, PF, HI
4:30pm  Rd 7 USX, FX, OO, DI
5:30pm  Rd 4 DUO; Rd 6 CX; Rd 8 LD, PF
7:00pm  Rd 8 USX, FX
8:00pm  Rd 9 LD, PF
CX judging pool
LD judging pool
Interp judging pools (HI, DI, Duo)
Public Speaking judging pools (USX, FX, OO)
Background: Check all boxes that apply
LD Coach
CX Coach
Public Speaking Coach
Interp Coach
LD Debater in HS
CX Debater in HS
Public Speaker in HS
Performer in HS
NDT
CEDA
APDA/NPDA
AFA/NFA
Collegiate Forensic Coach
Collegiate Professor
Former HS Coach
I.E. Judging Experience: Check all that apply
Judge Public Speaking often this year
No Experience judging public speaking
Judge Performance often this year
No Experience judging performance
Technical Execution
Author's Intent
Entertainment Value
Creativity
Technical Execution
Focus on Knowledge/Evidence
Rhetorical Value
Entertainment Value
Teasers before introduction
Unacceptable
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Acceptable
Technical Aspects
Spontaneous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Polished
Interpretation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Acting
Choice of Literature
Anything Published
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Literary Merit
Minimal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Maximize
the space
Rate of Delivery
Slow
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Rapid
Communication Issues
Rehearsed
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Spontaneous
Quantity of Sources
Minimal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Paramount
Quality of Sources
Minimal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Paramount
Movements /Gestures
Unnecessary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Necessary
Debate Judging Experience: Check all that apply
Judge CX debate often this year
No Experience judging CX debate
Judge LD debate often this year
No Experience judging LD debate
Communication Skills
Stock Issues
Policy Maker
Hypothesis Tester
Games Player
Tabula Rasa
On a scale of 1 to 10, rate the following:
Rate of Delivery
Slow
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Rapid
Communication Issues
Speaking
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Resolving
Quantity of Arguments
Few
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Many
Topicality
Critical
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Unimportant
Counterplans
Acceptable
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Unacceptable
Contradictory Negative Positions
Unacceptable
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Acceptable
Debate Theory Arguments
Unacceptable
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Acceptable
Kritiks
Unacceptable
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Acceptable
Speaking Skills/Persuasion
Direct Clash/Line by Line
Pure Values/Philosophy
Big Picture/Coherent Story
On a scale of 1 to 10, rate the following:
Rate of Delivery
Slow
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Rapid
Persuasive Communication
Unnecessary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Necessary
Value Premise / Core Value
Unnecessary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Necessary
Use of Examples
Unnecessary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Necessary
Use of Evidence
Minimal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Paramount
Focus on the debate
Big Picture
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Line by line
Approach to Resolution
Philosophic
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Pragmatic
Use of criteria
Unnecessary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Necessary
Home
Judging Application
South Texas NFL District Tournament
Thank you for your interest in judging the 2013 South Texas NFL District tournament being held on the
campus of  Bellaire High School April 11, 12 and 13, 2013.
List all affliations with South Texas schools or students including previous coaching or
workshop relations.
Availability: Please click on all of the times that you plan to judge during our tournament.
Did you judge at the 2012 South Texas NFL District tournament?
If you answered "Yes" to the last question, you may bypass the submission of IE & Debate paradigms.  Go directly to the
bottom of the page and click "submit" and the application process will be complete.

If you answered
"No" to the last question, please continue completing the questions in the IE paradigm and debate paradigm.
 All judges must have paradigm information on file before their name is placed into the judging pool.
Individual Events Paradigm
(if judging debate ONLY...skip IE paradigm & proceed to debate paradigm)
Judge Public Speaking previously, just not often this year
Judge Performance previously, just not often this year
Which best describes your approach to judging performance events? (rank from 1 to 4 with 1 being
most important...assign each category a different rank...
no two categories should receive the same rank.)
Which best describes your approach to judging public speaking events? (rank from 1 to 4 with 1 being
most important...assign each category a different rank...
no two categories should receive the same rank.)
Do you consider Original Oratory more a performance event or public speaking event?
When judging PERFORMANCE events, on a scale of 1 to 10 rate the following:
Performance approach in Humorous, Dramatic & Duo Interp
Movements /Gestures /Blocking in Humorous, Dramatic & Duo Interp
When judging PUBLIC SPEAKING events, on a scale of 1 to 10 rate the following:
Debate Paradigm
(if judging I.E.'s ONLY...skip debate paradigm & proceed to bottom of the page)
Judge CX debate previously, just not often this year
Judge LD debate previously, just not often this year
Which best describes your approach to judging cross examination debate?
Cross Examination Debate
(if not judging CX debate, skip to Lincoln Douglas paradigms)
Which best describes your approach to judging Lincoln Douglas debate?
Lincoln Douglas Debate
(if not judging LD debate, proceed to bottom of the page)
We will be paying $15 per round with
up to 3 rounds of paid standby.
I would like to be entered into the following judge pools for the 2013 South Texas NFL District tournament. (check all that apply)
PF judging pool